U.S. Wealth WatcherCelebrating Political Fortunes
HR 8787 · 119th CongressIntroduced

Banning foreign payment processors for military retailers

Defense & Aerospace
Vote
Donor money
Money gap
Summary

What the bill does

This bill would stop the Department of Defense from doing business with retailers that use payment processing equipment or services from companies based in China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, or other countries deemed a national security risk. The Secretary of Defense must review all current retailers and issue rules to cut ties with those using such equipment. Starting in 2027, no new contracts can be made with these retailers.

Why it matters

The stakes

This bill affects military personnel and their families who shop at stores on military bases. It aims to protect their payment data from being handled by foreign companies that could pose a security threat.

Major public companies this covers
  • Alibaba GroupBABA
  • Tencent HoldingsTCEHY
The vote

How the chamber split

Vote totals will appear when a roll-call is available.

The debate

What each side says

Supporters
  • It protects the payment data of service members from being processed by companies in countries that may pose a national security risk.bill
  • It ensures that the Department of Defense does not indirectly support foreign entities that could be adversarial to the United States.bill
Critics
  • It could disrupt existing contracts and limit the number of payment processors available for military retailers, potentially causing logistical issues.report
  • The definition of 'country of concern' is broad and could be expanded by the Secretary of Defense, creating uncertainty for businesses.bill

Each point links to its source. The views are attributed to those sources, not stated as ours.

Money lens

Defense & Aerospace money, split by party

The money lens appears when a bill has a recorded vote and matching sector PAC data.

Contributions and votes are public records, shown side by side. Correlation is not causation, and this page does not assert one caused the other.