Ban on certain supplements for troops
What the bill does
The bill requires the Secretary of Defense to publish and update a list of dietary supplement ingredients and performance-enhancing substances that are banned for use by military members. It also sets rules for how the list must be made available, allows commanders to offer education instead of punishment for first-time offenses, and clarifies that possessing a banned supplement is not considered drug abuse.
The stakes
This bill affects all active-duty service members and their commanders. It aims to protect troops from potentially harmful supplements while giving them a chance to avoid punishment if they unknowingly use a banned ingredient.
What each side says
- Service members should not be punished for accidentally using a supplement with a banned ingredient if they had no way of knowing it was prohibited.bill
- A clear, updated list of banned ingredients will help troops make safer choices about what they put in their bodies.bill
- Providing education and counseling instead of punishment for first-time offenses can help service members learn about supplement safety without ruining their careers.bill
- No recorded objections.
Each point links to its source. The views are attributed to those sources, not stated as ours.
From this bill outward
The bill
where every tie is measured fromWho paid lobbyists to work it
Direct tie24 groups · their total 2025 lobbying| Group | Issues | 2025 lobbying (all issues) | Has PAC? |
|---|---|---|---|
| STATE OF LOC NATION GLOBAL PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION› | AdvocacyOtherBanking | $80M | ✗No PAC |
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.› | EnergyBankingForeign | $70M | ✗No PAC |
| PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA› | HealthTechForeign | $38M | ✓PRAMAOAP |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES› | TechSports & MediaBanking | $26M | ✗No PAC |
| GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY› | TransportBankingForeign | $20M | ✓GMC |
| AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL› | BankingEnergyTransport | $19M | ✓ACCP |
| CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION› | TechDefenseOther | $19M | ✓CTWAPAC |
| AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC› | BankingTechLabor | $18M | ✓ASLSSFAP |
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION› | DefenseOtherBanking | $16M | ✓LMP |
| RTX CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES› | DefenseOtherBanking | $14M | ✗No PAC |
| NCTA - THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION› | TechBankingDefense | $14M | ✓NTITAPACN |
| GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP› | DefenseLaborOther | $13M | ✓GDCPACGDEP |
| GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC› | OtherLaborTech | $13M | ✗No PAC |
| COMCAST CORPORATION› | TechBankingOther | $13M | ✓CCPAC |
| FEDEX CORPORATION› | ForeignBankingTransport | $13M | ✓FCPAC |
| ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC› | HealthBankingOther | $12M | ✗No PAC |
| BOEING COMPANY› | DefenseTransportForeign | $11M | ✓TBP |
| OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION› | EnergyBankingTransport | $11M | ✓OPCPAC |
| T-MOBILE USA, INC.› | TechBankingOther | $11M | ✓TUIPACT |
| VISA INC.› | BankingForeignDefense | $11M | ✓VIPAC |
| SOUTHERN COMPANY› | EnergyBankingTransport | $11M | ✓TSGP |
| CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC,› | TechBankingDefense | $10M | ✓CC |
| HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL› | BankingEnergyOther | $10M | ✗No PAC |
| EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE› | EnergyBankingOther | $9.4M | ✗No PAC |
Election money, in the distance
Background · not tied to this billDefense & Aerospace PACs -> the members who votedThe background money view appears when a bill has a recorded vote and matching sector PAC data.
Lobbying filings, contributions, and votes are public records shown side by side. The further down the chain, the further the money is from this bill. This page does not assert that money caused any vote.