Scientific integrity rules for federal agencies
What the bill does
This bill requires federal agencies that fund, conduct, or oversee scientific research to adopt and enforce scientific integrity policies. It prohibits suppressing or altering scientific findings, protects scientists who speak out, and sets up a process for reporting violations. Each agency must appoint a Scientific Integrity Officer and provide training.
The stakes
The bill affects how government scientists share their work with the public and policymakers. It aims to keep political or financial pressures from influencing the science that guides decisions on health, environment, and safety.
How the chamber split
Vote totals will appear when a roll-call is available.
What each side says
- The bill protects scientists from being pressured to change or hide their findings, which helps ensure that policy decisions are based on sound science.bill
- It requires agencies to have clear rules and a process for reporting violations, making it easier to hold officials accountable if they interfere with science.bill
- The bill mandates that hiring and personnel actions for science positions be based on expertise, not politics, which could improve the quality of government research.bill
- The bill could slow down the release of scientific information by requiring agency review before publication, even if the review is only for technical accuracy.bill
- It adds new bureaucracy, such as requiring each agency to appoint a Scientific Integrity Officer and submit annual reports, which may divert resources from actual research.bill
Each point links to its source. The views are attributed to those sources, not stated as ours.
Tech & Telecom money, split by party
The money lens appears when a bill has a recorded vote and matching sector PAC data.
Contributions and votes are public records, shown side by side. Correlation is not causation, and this page does not assert one caused the other.