Young Kim
RIncumbentIncumbent leans on PAC money. 22% from PACs and 76% from individuals.
Candidates in the California District 40 House race, 2026 report raising $16.5M between them. Young Kim reports $7.3M and Ken Calvert reports $4.1M, a gap of $3.2M. Of what Young Kim reports, 76% came from individuals and 22% from PACs. Outside groups spent against CALVERT, KEN ($577,540) and for CALVERT, KEN ($223,650). Outside groups spent against KIM, YOUNG ($4.7M) and for KIM, YOUNG ($1.8M).
Ranked by money raised. Each row shows the campaign money mix and a plain-English read.
Incumbent leans on PAC money. 22% from PACs and 76% from individuals.
Incumbent leans on PAC money. 34% from PACs and 62% from individuals.
78% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 22% from other sources.
Small-donor heavy. 88% from individuals and 0% from PACs.
77% from individuals, 2% from PACs, and 21% from other sources.
39% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 61% from other sources.
Candidate leans on PAC money. 23% from PACs and 77% from individuals.
Small-donor heavy. 100% from individuals and 0% from PACs.
Small-donor heavy. 100% from individuals and 0% from PACs.
3% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 97% from other sources.
Small-donor heavy. 97% from individuals and 0% from PACs.
Small-donor heavy. 100% from individuals and 0% from PACs.
$2.1M in itemized outside money is on file for this cycle. Candidate fundraising is shown separately below.
This split is from the candidates' own reported fundraising.
Young Kim is the linked incumbent for this race.
This is the incumbent's own funding by donor sector for the cycle.
Money, side by side. Green marks the leader on each line.
Young Kim R · incumbent | vs | Ken Calvert R · incumbent |
|---|---|---|
| $7.3M | Raised | $4.1M |
| $1.7M | Cash on hand | $1.5M |
| 22% | From PACs | 34% |
| 76% | From individuals | 62% |
| Banking & Financial | Top donor sector | Ideological / Leadership |
| Yes | Incumbent | Yes |