Brandon Riker
D46% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 54% from other sources.
Candidates in the California District 48 House race, 2026 report raising $10.6M between them. Brandon Riker reports $2.3M and Jim Desmond reports $2.2M, a gap of $95,592. Of what Brandon Riker reports, 46% came from individuals and 0% from PACs.
Ranked by money raised. Each row shows the campaign money mix and a plain-English read.
46% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 54% from other sources.
Small-donor heavy. 93% from individuals and 7% from PACs.
Candidate leans on PAC money. 21% from PACs and 79% from individuals.
Incumbent leans on PAC money. 24% from PACs and 49% from individuals.
Small-donor heavy. 93% from individuals and 6% from PACs.
47% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 53% from other sources.
Small-donor heavy. 94% from individuals and 5% from PACs.
68% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 32% from other sources.
Small-donor heavy. 90% from individuals and 0% from PACs.
Small-donor heavy. 89% from individuals and 0% from PACs.
56% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 44% from other sources.
Small-donor heavy. 95% from individuals and 0% from PACs.
26% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 74% from other sources.
$0 in itemized outside money is on file for this cycle. Candidate fundraising is shown separately below.
This split is from the candidates' own reported fundraising.
Darrell Issa is the linked incumbent for this race.
This is the incumbent's own funding by donor sector for the cycle.
Money, side by side. Green marks the leader on each line.
Brandon Riker D · challenger BR | vs | JD Jim Desmond R · challenger |
|---|---|---|
| $2.3M | Raised | $2.2M |
| $21K | Cash on hand | $1.2M |
| 0% | From PACs | 7% |
| 46% | From individuals | 93% |
| Too few to rank | Top donor sector | Too few to rank |
| No | Incumbent | No |