Jason Friedman
D73% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 27% from other sources.
Candidates in the Illinois District 07 House race, 2026 report raising $6.8M between them. Jason Friedman reports $2.5M and Thomas Fisher reports $916,726, a gap of $1.6M. Of what Jason Friedman reports, 73% came from individuals and 0% from PACs.
Ranked by money raised. Each row shows the campaign money mix and a plain-English read.
73% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 27% from other sources.
Small-donor heavy. 89% from individuals and 5% from PACs.
Small-donor heavy. 98% from individuals and 2% from PACs.
67% from individuals, 8% from PACs, and 25% from other sources.
44% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 56% from other sources.
Small-donor heavy. 88% from individuals and 2% from PACs.
Small-donor heavy. 86% from individuals and 0% from PACs.
Candidate leans on PAC money. 23% from PACs and 71% from individuals.
Small-donor heavy. 99% from individuals and 1% from PACs.
Incumbent leans on PAC money. 24% from PACs and 39% from individuals.
0% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 100% from other sources.
83% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 17% from other sources.
23% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 77% from other sources.
16% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 84% from other sources.
49% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 51% from other sources.
63% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 37% from other sources.
Still has cash to spend. $7K on hand from $8K raised.
$0 in itemized outside money is on file for this cycle. Candidate fundraising is shown separately below.
This split is from the candidates' own reported fundraising.
Danny K. Davis is the linked incumbent for this race.
This is the incumbent's own funding by donor sector for the cycle.
Money, side by side. Green marks the leader on each line.
Jason Friedman D · challenger JF | vs | TF Thomas Fisher D · challenger |
|---|---|---|
| $2.5M | Raised | $917K |
| $386K | Cash on hand | $53K |
| 0% | From PACs | 5% |
| 73% | From individuals | 89% |
| Too few to rank | Top donor sector | Too few to rank |
| No | Incumbent | No |