U.S. Wealth WatcherCelebrating Political Fortunes
<- All 2026 races
Virginia · U.S. House · District 11 · 2026

Virginia District 11 House race

General election in 96 days · Nov 3, 2026
The read · Virginia District 11 House race

James R. Walkinshaw has raised more than 2 times the next candidate.

Democrat James R. Walkinshaw has raised about $2.7M, more than 2 times any rival.

Bree Fram reports 98% of campaign money from individuals.

$1.0M in itemized outside money is on file, led by PROTECT PROGRESS.

FEC filings, 2026 cycle. Money raised is net of transfers between a candidate's own committees.

Every candidate on file

Ranked by money raised. Each row shows the campaign money mix and a plain-English read.

James R. Walkinshaw

James R. Walkinshaw

DIncumbent
D · incumbent

Incumbent leans on PAC money. 34% from PACs and 66% from individuals.

66% individuals34% PACs0% other
$2.7M
raised
AR

Amy Roma

D
D · challenger

41% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 59% from other sources.

41% individuals0% PACs59% other
$1.3M
raised
GC

Gerald Connolly

DIncumbent
D · incumbent

Incumbent leans on PAC money. 28% from PACs and 58% from individuals.

58% individuals28% PACs14% other
$579K
raised
SP

Stella Pekarsky

D
D · challenger

32% from individuals, 5% from PACs, and 63% from other sources.

32% individuals5% PACs63% other
$398K
raised
BF

Bree Fram

D
D · challenger

Small-donor heavy. 98% from individuals and 0% from PACs.

98% individuals0% PACs2% other
$289K
raised
NH

Nathan Headrick

R
R · challenger

1% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 99% from other sources.

1% individuals0% PACs99% other
$252K
raised
DL

Daniel Lee

D
D · challenger

57% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 43% from other sources.

57% individuals0% PACs43% other
$137K
raised
CB

Candice Bennett

D
D · challenger

77% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 23% from other sources.

77% individuals0% PACs23% other
$38K
raised
Show 2 more candidates
AP

Arthur Purves

R
R · challenger

29% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 71% from other sources.

29% individuals0% PACs71% other
$6K
raised
MM

Michael Van Meter

R
R · challenger

Small-donor heavy. 100% from individuals and 0% from PACs.

100% individuals0% PACs0% other
$5K
raised

Where the money came from

$1.0M in itemized outside money is on file for this cycle. Candidate fundraising is shown separately below.

Ideological / Leadership$1.0M
Small donors & unclassified$76K
Labor / Unions$58K
Banking & Financial$29K
Defense & Aerospace$20K
Agriculture$15K
Transportation$15K
Health & Pharma$13K

Biggest itemized outside spenders

  • PROTECT PROGRESS · super pac$1.0M
  • L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PAC · pac$20K
  • NATIONAL ACTIVE AND RETIRED FEDERAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COM (NARFE-PAC) · pac$16K
  • AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE · pac$15K
  • COMMON GROUND PAC · pac$15K
  • COMMONWEALTH PAC · pac$15K
  • DELOITTE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE · pac$15K
  • INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS INTERESTED IN REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION PAC · pac$15K

PACs vs the people

This split is from the candidates' own reported fundraising.

19%56%25%
19% PACs56% individuals25% other

The incumbent's record

James R. Walkinshaw is the linked incumbent for this race.

Net worth (2025)
$883K
$565K - $1.2M.
Stock trades
None on file
No disclosed individual stock transactions.
Committees
2
Current full committee seats on file.

Where they sit

  • House Committee on Homeland Security
  • House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

Who funds them

This is the incumbent's own funding by donor sector for the cycle.

Ideological / Leadership$1.0M
Small donors & unclassified$76K
Labor / Unions$58K
Banking & Financial$29K
Defense & Aerospace$20K
Agriculture$15K
Full profile: net worth, donors, trades, and votes ->

The tale of the tape

Money, side by side. Green marks the leader on each line.

James R. Walkinshaw
D · incumbent
James R. Walkinshaw
vs
AR
Amy Roma
D · challenger
$2.7M
Raised
$1.3M
$968K
Cash on hand
$0
34%
From PACs
0%
66%
From individuals
41%
Ideological / Leadership
Top donor sector
Too few to rank
Yes
Incumbent
No