James R. Walkinshaw
DIncumbentD · incumbent
Incumbent leans on PAC money. 34% from PACs and 66% from individuals.
66% individuals34% PACs0% other
$2.7M
raised
<- All 2026 races
Full profile: net worth, donors, trades, and votes ->
Virginia · U.S. House · District 11 · 2026
Virginia District 11 House race
General election in 51 days · Nov 3, 2026
The read · Virginia District 11 House race
James R. Walkinshaw has raised more than 2 times the next candidate.
Candidates in the Virginia District 11 House race, 2026 report raising $5.7M between them. James R. Walkinshaw reports $2.7M and Amy Roma reports $1.3M, a gap of $1.4M. Of what James R. Walkinshaw reports, 66% came from individuals and 34% from PACs. Outside groups spent against WALKINSHAW, JAMES ($2,790) and for WALKINSHAW, JAMES ($1M).
Public campaign-finance filings, 2026 cycle. Candidate rows are filers on record, not final ballot lists. Totals are rounded to whole dollars.
Every candidate on file
Ranked by money raised. Each row shows the campaign money mix and a plain-English read.
AR
Amy Roma
DD · challenger
41% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 59% from other sources.
41% individuals0% PACs59% other
$1.3M
raised
Gerald Connolly
DIncumbentD · incumbent
Incumbent leans on PAC money. 28% from PACs and 58% from individuals.
58% individuals28% PACs14% other
$579K
raised
SP
Stella Pekarsky
DD · challenger
32% from individuals, 5% from PACs, and 63% from other sources.
32% individuals5% PACs63% other
$398K
raised
BF
Bree Fram
DD · challenger
Small-donor heavy. 98% from individuals and 0% from PACs.
98% individuals0% PACs2% other
$289K
raised
NH
Nathan Headrick
RR · challenger
1% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 99% from other sources.
1% individuals0% PACs99% other
$252K
raised
DL
Daniel Lee
DD · challenger
57% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 43% from other sources.
57% individuals0% PACs43% other
$137K
raised
CB
Candice Bennett
DD · challenger
77% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 23% from other sources.
77% individuals0% PACs23% other
$38K
raised
Show 2 more candidates
AP
Arthur Purves
RR · challenger
29% from individuals, 0% from PACs, and 71% from other sources.
29% individuals0% PACs71% other
$6K
raised
MM
Michael Van Meter
RR · challenger
Small-donor heavy. 100% from individuals and 0% from PACs.
100% individuals0% PACs0% other
$5K
raised
Where the money came from
$1.0M in itemized outside money is on file for this cycle. Candidate fundraising is shown separately below.
Ideological / Leadership$1.0M
Small donors & unclassified$94K
Labor / Unions$75K
Defense & Aerospace$20K
Agriculture$15K
Banking & Financial$15K
Transportation$15K
Biggest itemized outside spenders
- PROTECT PROGRESS · super pac$1.0M
- L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. PAC · pac$20K
- NATIONAL ACTIVE AND RETIRED FEDERAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COM (NARFE-PAC) · pac$19K
- AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE · pac$15K
- COMMON GROUND PAC · pac$15K
- COMMONWEALTH PAC · pac$15K
- DELOITTE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE · pac$15K
- INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS INTERESTED IN REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION PAC · pac$15K
PACs vs the people
This split is from the candidates' own reported fundraising.
19%56%25%
19% PACs56% individuals25% other
The incumbent's record
James R. Walkinshaw is the linked incumbent for this race.
Net worth (2025)
$883K
$565K+.
Stock trades
None on file
No disclosed individual stock transactions.
Committees
2
Current full committee seats on file.
Where they sit
- House Committee on Homeland Security
- House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
Who funds them
This is the incumbent's own funding by donor sector for the cycle.
Ideological / Leadership$1.0M
Small donors & unclassified$94K
Labor / Unions$75K
Defense & Aerospace$20K
Agriculture$15K
Banking & Financial$15K
The tale of the tape
Money, side by side. Green marks the leader on each line.
James R. Walkinshaw D · incumbent | vs | AR Amy Roma D · challenger |
|---|---|---|
| $2.7M | Raised | $1.3M |
| $968K | Cash on hand | $0 |
| 34% | From PACs | 0% |
| 66% | From individuals | 41% |
| Ideological / Leadership | Top donor sector | Too few to rank |
| Yes | Incumbent | No |