
Stacey E. Plaskett
What the money shows
Stacey E. Plaskett has an estimated net worth of -$175,000. The 2026 campaign raised $712,670. Stacey E. Plaskett sits on Defense Intelligence and Overhead Architecture and National Intelligence Enterprise.
Sources: House disclosures · Senate disclosures · FEC
Bills weighed against funded sectors
Each pan counts bills. Excluded bills are shown beside the scale when the vote or bill direction is unclear.
Other
$98K in corporate money from other · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Banking & Financial
$46K in corporate money from banking · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Transportation
$26K in corporate money from transportation · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Insurance
$20K in corporate money from insurance · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Real Estate & Construction
$15K in corporate money from real estate · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Health & Pharma
$15K in corporate money from health · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Retail & Consumer
$13K in corporate money from retail · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Energy & Utilities
$12K in corporate money from energy · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Agriculture
$5K in corporate money from agriculture · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Ideological / Leadership
$5K in corporate money from ideological / leadership · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Labor / Unions
$5K in union money · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Law & Lobbying
$4K in corporate money from law · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Net worth over time
Estimated from financial disclosures. The band shows the disclosed range; the line is the midpoint estimate.
Term history
- RepresentativeVI-0D2025 – 2027 · 2 yrs
- RepresentativeVI-0D2023 – 2025 · 2 yrs
- RepresentativeVI-0D2021 – 2023 · 2 yrs
- RepresentativeVI-0D2019 – 2021 · 2 yrs
- RepresentativeVI-0D2017 – 2019 · 2 yrs
- RepresentativeVI-0D2015 – 2017 · 2 yrs
If they'd just invested 20%
A disciplined-saver benchmark: 20% of each year's government salary, invested at an assumed 10%/yr return — versus actual disclosed net worth.
Hypothetical, not actual savings — see methodology.
Representative Stacey E. Plaskett, VI
Born May 13, 1966.
VI · District 00
General election 2026-11-03. Money figures are FEC filings for the 2026 cycle.
Stacey E. Plaskett has raised more than 18 times the next candidate.
Democrat Stacey E. Plaskett has raised about $713K, more than 18 times any rival.
Janelle Sarauw reports 100% of campaign money from individuals.
The tale of the tape
Money, side by side. Green marks the leader on each line.
Stacey E. Plaskett D · incumbent | vs | NH Nicole Helenese D · challenger |
|---|---|---|
| $713K | Raised | $40K |
| $11K | Cash on hand | $14K |
| 39% | From PACs | 6% |
| 61% | From individuals | 56% |
| Banking & Financial | Top donor sector | Too few to rank |
| Yes | Incumbent | No |
Federal contractors who funded this member
This is a documented association, not a claim that campaign money caused an award.
All federal contractors who funded you
Stacey E. Plaskett · sources
Only sources that fed this profile are listed here.
| Source | What it gave this page | Last fetched |
|---|---|---|
| @unitedstates congress-legislators github.com | Roster, terms, identifiers, official site link | 2026-07-30 |
| Wikidata www.wikidata.org | Education, career before office, family ties | 2026-07-30 |
| The member's official site | Where to reach them. We link out rather than republishing office addresses and phone numbers. | - |