
Tammy Baldwin
What the money shows
Tammy Baldwin has an estimated net worth of $558,000. The 2026 campaign raised $2.8M. Outside groups had $51M spent against Tammy Baldwin and $7.1M spent for Tammy Baldwin. Tammy Baldwin sits on Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies and Science, Manufacturing, and Competitiveness.
Sources: House disclosures · Senate disclosures · FEC
Bills weighed against funded sectors
Each pan counts bills. Excluded bills are shown beside the scale when the vote or bill direction is unclear.
Ideological / Leadership
$6.6M in corporate money from ideological / leadership · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Labor / Unions
$484K in union money · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Foreign-policy advocacy
$138K in corporate money from foreign-policy advocacy · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Other
$109K in corporate money from other · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Health & Pharma
$25K in corporate money from health · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Banking & Financial
$17K in corporate money from banking · 13 roll calls · 9 bills
Real Estate & Construction
$15K in corporate money from real estate · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Energy & Utilities
$14K in corporate money from energy · 2 roll calls · 1 bills
Tech & Telecom
$13K in corporate money from tech · 8 roll calls · 2 bills
Defense & Aerospace
$10K in corporate money from defense · 1 roll calls · 1 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Law & Lobbying
$10K in corporate money from law · 0 roll calls · 0 bills
No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.
Net worth over time
Estimated from financial disclosures. The band shows the disclosed range; the line is the midpoint estimate.
† Includes one or more open-ended top brackets (over $50M). The high end is a floor, so the true figure may be higher.
Term history
- SenatorWID2025 – 2031 · 6 yrs
- SenatorWID2019 – 2025 · 6 yrs
- SenatorWIDHouse → Senate2013 – 2019 · 6 yrs
- RepresentativeWI-2D2011 – 2013 · 2 yrs
- RepresentativeWI-2D2009 – 2011 · 2 yrs
- RepresentativeWI-2D2007 – 2009 · 2 yrs
- RepresentativeWI-2D2005 – 2007 · 2 yrs
- RepresentativeWI-2D2003 – 2005 · 2 yrs
- RepresentativeWI-2D2001 – 2003 · 2 yrs
- RepresentativeWI-2D1999 – 2001 · 2 yrs
If they'd just invested 20%
A disciplined-saver benchmark: 20% of each year's government salary, invested at an assumed 10%/yr return — versus actual disclosed net worth.
Hypothetical, not actual savings — see methodology.
Senator Tammy Baldwin, WI
Born February 11, 1962.
Federal contractors who funded this member
This is a documented association, not a claim that campaign money caused an award.
Recorded votes
31 votes · 9 Yea · 22 Nay. "Sector money" is this member's corporate and union money from the sector each bill touches. Receipts, not a claim about the vote. Money-linked votes first.
Who else Wisconsin sends to Congress
2 senators and 8 of 8 House seats filled. Counting this seat.
- Ron JohnsonSenatorR

- Bryan SteilDistrict 1R

- Mark PocanDistrict 2D

- Derrick Van OrdenDistrict 3R

- Gwen MooreDistrict 4D

- Scott FitzgeraldDistrict 5R

- Glenn GrothmanDistrict 6R

- Thomas P. TiffanyDistrict 7R

- Tony WiedDistrict 8R

Seat counts come from the 2020 census apportionment. A seat shows as open when no current member holds it. Source
Tammy Baldwin · sources
Only sources that fed this profile are listed here.
| Source | What it gave this page | Last fetched |
|---|---|---|
| @unitedstates congress-legislators github.com | Roster, terms, identifiers, official site link | 2026-07-30 |
| Wikidata www.wikidata.org | Education, career before office, family ties | 2026-07-30 |
| The member's official site | Where to reach them. We link out rather than republishing office addresses and phone numbers. | - |