U.S. Wealth WatcherCelebrating Political Fortunes
Derrick Van Orden

Derrick Van Orden

Representative· WIRHouse● In officeOn the ballot in 2026
Before officeBusinessperson · Actor · Military personnel
File · Money Read

What the money shows

Derrick Van Orden has an estimated net worth of -$76,000. The 2026 campaign raised $5.2M. Outside groups had $7.2M spent against Derrick Van Orden and $331,790 spent for Derrick Van Orden. Derrick Van Orden sits on Economic Opportunity and Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.

Sources: House disclosures · Senate disclosures · FEC

Est. net worth
−$76K
−$197K – $45K
Raised (last cycle)
$5.2M
FEC · cycle 2026
Years in role
3
Representative since 2023
Net-worth filings
3
+$0 since 2023
File — Balance

Bills weighed against funded sectors

Each pan counts bills. Excluded bills are shown beside the scale when the vote or bill direction is unclear.

Other

$257K in corporate money from other · 0 roll calls · 0 bills

against other
0 bills
with other
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

Ideological / Leadership

$186K in corporate money from ideological / leadership · 0 roll calls · 0 bills

against ideological / leadership
0 bills
with ideological / leadership
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

Law & Lobbying

$166K in corporate money from law · 9 roll calls · 8 bills

against law
0 bills
with law
2 bills
6 excluded · not weighed

Tech & Telecom

$49K in corporate money from tech · 6 roll calls · 6 bills

against tech
0 bills
with tech
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

6 excluded · not weighed

Banking & Financial

$32K in corporate money from banking · 9 roll calls · 7 bills

against banking
0 bills
with banking
4 bills
3 excluded · not weighed

Foreign-policy advocacy

$20K in corporate money from foreign-policy advocacy · 0 roll calls · 0 bills

against foreign-policy advocacy
0 bills
with foreign-policy advocacy
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

Agriculture

$20K in corporate money from agriculture · 1 roll calls · 1 bills

against agriculture
0 bills
with agriculture
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

1 excluded · not weighed

Health & Pharma

$20K in corporate money from health · 6 roll calls · 6 bills

against health
0 bills
with health
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

6 excluded · not weighed

Energy & Utilities

$17K in corporate money from energy · 10 roll calls · 9 bills

against energy
0 bills
with energy
3 bills
6 excluded · not weighed

Insurance

$10K in corporate money from insurance · 0 roll calls · 0 bills

against insurance
0 bills
with insurance
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

Party Committee

$10K in corporate money from party committee · 0 roll calls · 0 bills

against party committee
0 bills
with party committee
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

File A — Net Worth

Net worth over time

Estimated from financial disclosures. The band shows the disclosed range; the line is the midpoint estimate.

Why negative? Financial disclosures require officials to report mortgages and loans as liabilities, but exclude personal residences and other non-income-producing assets. Someone whose main asset is their home can show a negative disclosednet worth in some years — it doesn’t necessarily mean they’re in debt. See methodology.
midpoint disclosed range govt salary
source filing →
File C — Service

Term history

  1. RepresentativeWI-3R
    20252027 · 2 yrs
  2. RepresentativeWI-3R
    20232025 · 2 yrs
File D — Benchmark

If they'd just invested 20%

A disciplined-saver benchmark: 20% of each year's government salary, invested at an assumed 10%/yr return — versus actual disclosed net worth.

hypothetical retirement actual net worth salary

Hypothetical, not actual savings — see methodology.