U.S. Wealth WatcherCelebrating Political Fortunes
HRES 489 · 119th CongressIntroducedVoted Jun 10, 2025

Rules for four D.C. and fentanyl bills

Sponsored by Erin Houchin

The vote
211-206
+5 margin
Worked the bill
In the distance
Summary

What the bill does

This resolution sets the rules for debating four bills in the House. It allows the House to consider bills that would ban noncitizens from voting in D.C., require D.C. to follow federal immigration laws, change police discipline rules in D.C., and make fentanyl-related substances permanently illegal.

Why it matters

The stakes

The resolution determines whether the House will debate and vote on these four bills. The outcome affects voting rights in D.C., immigration enforcement, police accountability, and drug policy.

The vote

How the chamber split

211 yea · 206 nayPassed · 13 not voting
211 yes
206 no
Voted yes208
Rep 207Dem 0
Voted no203
Rep 0Dem 203
See how each member voted· all 411
Voted yes · 208
Aaron BeanR · FL
Andy BarrR · KY
Andy BiggsR · AZ
Ann WagnerR · MO
Ben ClineR · VA
Brad KnottR · NC
Brian JackR · GA
Chip RoyR · TX
Cory MillsR · FL
Don BaconR · NE
Gabe EvansR · CO
Jeff CrankR · CO
Jeff HurdR · CO
Jim JordanR · OH
Joe WilsonR · SC
John JamesR · MI
John JoyceR · PA
Kevin HernR · OK
Mike BostR · IL
Mike CareyR · OH
Mike FloodR · NE
Mike KellyR · PA
Nancy MaceR · SC
Pat FallonR · TX
Randy FineR · FL
Ron EstesR · KS
Sam GravesR · MO
Tim MooreR · NC
Tom ColeR · OK
Tom EmmerR · MN
Tony WiedR · WI
Vince FongR · CA
Young KimR · CA
Voted no · 203
Adam GrayD · CA
Adam SmithD · WA
Al GreenD · TX
Ami BeraD · CA
Dave MinD · CA
Derek TranD · CA
Dina TitusD · NV
Ed CaseD · HI
Gabe AmoD · RI
Glenn IveyD · MD
Grace MengD · NY
Greg CasarD · TX
Gwen MooreD · WI
Ilhan OmarD · MN
Jason CrowD · CO
Jim CostaD · CA
Joe NeguseD · CO
Josh RileyD · NY
Judy ChuD · CA
Mark PocanD · WI
Mike LevinD · CA
Nellie PouD · NJ
Paul TonkoD · NY
Raul RuizD · CA
Ro KhannaD · CA
Susie LeeD · NV
Ted LieuD · CA
The debate

What each side says

Supporters
  • It allows the House to consider bills that address important issues such as election security and immigration enforcement.bill
  • It streamlines debate by waiving procedural objections, making the process more efficient.bill
Critics
  • It limits debate and amendments, reducing the opportunity for minority party input.bill
  • It combines multiple controversial bills into one rule, preventing separate consideration.bill

Each point links to its source. The views are attributed to those sources, not stated as ours.

Lobbying filings, contributions, and votes are public records shown side by side. The further down the chain, the further the money is from this bill. This page does not assert that money caused any vote.