U.S. Wealth WatcherCelebrating Political Fortunes
Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Representative· FLDHouse● In officeOn the ballot in 2026
Before officeCongressional staff
File · Money Read

What the money shows

Debbie Wasserman Schultz has an estimated net worth of -$801,500. The 2026 campaign raised $3.1M. Outside groups had $129,301 spent against Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Debbie Wasserman Schultz sits on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies and Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies. Debbie Wasserman Schultz's largest stock trade on file was $15,000 tied to Ichor Holdings Ltd in June 2026.

Sources: House disclosures · Senate disclosures · FEC

Est. net worth
−$802K
−$1.5M+
Raised (last cycle)
$3.1M
FEC · cycle 2026
Years in role
21
Representative since 2005
Net-worth filings
17
−$1.1M since 2008
File — Balance

Bills weighed against funded sectors

Each pan counts bills. Excluded bills are shown beside the scale when the vote or bill direction is unclear.

Banking & Financial

$112K in corporate money from banking · 9 roll calls · 7 bills

against banking
3 bills
with banking
1 bill
3 excluded · not weighed

Labor / Unions

$110K in union money · 1 roll calls · 1 bills

against labor / unions
0 bills
with labor / unions
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

1 excluded · not weighed

Other

$77K in corporate money from other · 0 roll calls · 0 bills

against other
0 bills
with other
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

Health & Pharma

$67K in corporate money from health · 6 roll calls · 6 bills

against health
0 bills
with health
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

6 excluded · not weighed

Foreign-policy advocacy

$30K in corporate money from foreign-policy advocacy · 0 roll calls · 0 bills

against foreign-policy advocacy
0 bills
with foreign-policy advocacy
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

Ideological / Leadership

$20K in corporate money from ideological / leadership · 0 roll calls · 0 bills

against ideological / leadership
0 bills
with ideological / leadership
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

Transportation

$20K in corporate money from transportation · 2 roll calls · 2 bills

against transportation
0 bills
with transportation
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

2 excluded · not weighed

Agriculture

$10K in corporate money from agriculture · 1 roll calls · 1 bills

against agriculture
0 bills
with agriculture
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

1 excluded · not weighed

Defense & Aerospace

$10K in corporate money from defense · 3 roll calls · 3 bills

against defense
0 bills
with defense
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

3 excluded · not weighed

Energy & Utilities

$10K in corporate money from energy · 10 roll calls · 9 bills

against energy
3 bills
with energy
0 bills
6 excluded · not weighed

Insurance

$10K in corporate money from insurance · 0 roll calls · 0 bills

against insurance
0 bills
with insurance
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

Real Estate & Construction

$10K in corporate money from real estate · 0 roll calls · 0 bills

against real estate
0 bills
with real estate
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

Tech & Telecom

$10K in corporate money from tech · 6 roll calls · 6 bills

against tech
0 bills
with tech
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

6 excluded · not weighed

Sports, Media & Entertainment

$7K in corporate money from sports, media · 0 roll calls · 0 bills

against sports, media
0 bills
with sports, media
0 bills
No scored votes

No bill this cycle clearly names a funded sector as beneficiary.

File A — Net Worth

Net worth over time

Estimated from financial disclosures. The band shows the disclosed range; the line is the midpoint estimate.

Why negative? Financial disclosures require officials to report mortgages and loans as liabilities, but exclude personal residences and other non-income-producing assets. Someone whose main asset is their home can show a negative disclosednet worth in some years — it doesn’t necessarily mean they’re in debt. See methodology.
midpoint disclosed range govt salary
source filing →

† Includes one or more open-ended top brackets (over $50M). The high end is a floor, so the true figure may be higher.

File C — Service

Term history

  1. RepresentativeFL-25D
    20252027 · 2 yrs
  2. RepresentativeFL-25D
    20232025 · 2 yrs
  3. RepresentativeFL-23D
    20212023 · 2 yrs
  4. RepresentativeFL-23D
    20192021 · 2 yrs
  5. RepresentativeFL-23D
    20172019 · 2 yrs
  6. RepresentativeFL-23D
    20152017 · 2 yrs
  7. RepresentativeFL-23D
    20132015 · 2 yrs
  8. RepresentativeFL-20D
    20112013 · 2 yrs
  9. RepresentativeFL-20D
    20092011 · 2 yrs
  10. RepresentativeFL-20D
    20072009 · 2 yrs
  11. RepresentativeFL-20D
    20052007 · 2 yrs
File D — Benchmark

If they'd just invested 20%

A disciplined-saver benchmark: 20% of each year's government salary, invested at an assumed 10%/yr return — versus actual disclosed net worth.

hypothetical retirement actual net worth salary

Hypothetical, not actual savings — see methodology.